Reputation and the league standing effect: the case of a split season in minor league baseball

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2018
Volume: 50
Issue: 41
Pages: 4447-4455

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Split season league design resets standings at the midpoint of the season, thus allowing for two periods in which a team can potentially achieve success in a single season. This context allows us to test both the reputation of the first half winner and the league standing effect on demand. Examination of game-level data from the 2010 Southern League reveals fans are unaffected by measures of both team quality and league standing in the second half of the season. On the other hand, the first half winners saw an 11% increase in attendance as a percent of stadium capacity, suggesting that in the second half of the season winners matter more than winning.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:50:y:2018:i:41:p:4447-4455
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24