Disorganization

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 1997
Volume: 112
Issue: 4
Pages: 1091-1126

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Under central planning, many firms relied on a single supplier for critical inputs. Transition has led to decentralized bargaining between suppliers and buyers. Under incomplete contracts or asymmetric information, bargaining may inefficiently break down, and if chains of production link many specialized producers, output will decline sharply. Mechanisms that mitigate these problems in the West, such as reputation, can only play a limited role in transition. The empirical evidence suggests that output has fallen farthest for the goods with the most complex production process, and that disorganization has been more important in the former Soviet Union than in Central Europe.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:112:y:1997:i:4:p:1091-1126.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-24