A measurement of decreasing impatience for health and money

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Year: 2016
Volume: 52
Issue: 3
Pages: 213-231

Authors (3)

Han Bleichrodt (Universidad de Alicante) Yu Gao (not in RePEc) Kirsten I. M. Rohde (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Abstract This paper measures deviations from constant discounting and compares these deviations for health and money. Our measurements make no assumptions about utility and do not require separability of preferences over time. In an experiment, most subjects were decreasingly impatient, but a substantial minority was increasingly impatient. The deviations from constant discounting were more pronounced for health than for money suggesting that time preferences are domain-specific. Hyperbolic discounting (Loewenstein and Prelec, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573–597, 1992) and proportional discounting (Mazur, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, 5, 55–73, 1987) best described time preferences. Quasi-hyperbolic discounting, the most popular model to accommodate deviations from constant discounting, was rejected for both health and money.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:jrisku:v:52:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-016-9240-0
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24