Non-proportional thinking in IPOs

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2023
Volume: 55
Issue: 2
Pages: 146-154

Authors (5)

Sylvain Bourjade (Groupe ESC Toulouse) Annalisa Fraccaro (not in RePEc) Debrah Meloso (not in RePEc) Roman Skripnik (not in RePEc) David Stolin (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.201 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The fact that initial-to-final IPO price revision ratios are strong predictors of IPO underpricing is well known to researchers. Our study documents that the dollar amount of the price revision matters above and beyond the revision ratio, and dramatically so. Immediately following the IPO, market participants appear to see a positive signal in greater dollar amount revisions, even if holding price revision ratios equal. This extends Shue and Townsend (Journal of Finance, 2021) finding of market participants’ ‘non-proportional thinking’ to the IPO setting. It also implies that the dollar amount of price revision deserves attention from future IPO researchers, particularly when studying the determinants of IPO underpricing.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:2:p:146-154
Journal Field
General
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-24