Optimal Design of Experiments in the Presence of Interference

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 2018
Volume: 100
Issue: 5
Pages: 844-860

Authors (4)

Sarah Baird (not in RePEc) J. Aislinn Bohren (Carnegie Mellon University) Craig McIntosh (not in RePEc) Berk Özler (Stanford University)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Abstract We formalize the optimal design of experiments when there is interference between units, that is, an individual’s outcome depends on the outcomes of others in her group. We focus on randomized saturation designs, two-stage experiments that first randomize treatment saturation of a group, then individual treatment assignment. We map the potential outcomes framework with partial interference to a regression model with clustered errors, calculate standard errors of randomized saturation designs, and derive analytical insights about the optimal design. We show that the power to detect average treatment effects declines precisely with the ability to identify novel treatment and spillover effects.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:100:y:2018:i:5:p:844-860
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24