Discounting in economic evaluations: stepping forward towards optimal decision rules

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2007
Volume: 16
Issue: 3
Pages: 307-317

Score contribution per author:

0.402 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence has recently changed its guidelines on discounting costs and effects in economic evaluations. In common with most other regulatory bodies it now requires that health effects should be discounted at the same rate as costs. We show that the guideline leads to sub‐optimal decisions because it fails to account for the changing value of health. NICE (and other regulatory bodies) should either use differential discounting or stipulate how the changing value of health should otherwise be dealt with. We also show how binding health service budget constraints should be incorporated in evaluations. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:16:y:2007:i:3:p:307-317
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-24