Equilibrium Grading Policies With Implications for Female Interest in STEM Courses

S-Tier
Journal: Econometrica
Year: 2024
Volume: 92
Issue: 3
Pages: 849-880

Authors (4)

Tom Ahn (Naval Postgraduate School) Peter Arcidiacono (not in RePEc) Amy Hopson (not in RePEc) James Thomas (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We show that stricter grading policies in STEM courses reduce STEM enrollment, especially for women. We estimate a model of student demand for courses and optimal effort choices given professor grading policies. Grading policies are treated as equilibrium objects that in part depend on student demand for courses. Differences in demand for STEM and non‐STEM courses explain much of why STEM classes give lower grades. Restrictions on grading policies that equalize average grades across classes reduce the STEM gender gap and increase overall enrollment in STEM classes.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:emetrp:v:92:y:2024:i:3:p:849-880
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-24