Localized Competition and the Aggregation of Plant-Level Increasing Returns: Blast Furnaces, 1929-1935.

S-Tier
Journal: Journal of Political Economy
Year: 1996
Volume: 104
Issue: 2
Pages: 241-66

Authors (3)

Bertin, Amy L (not in RePEc) Bresnahan, Timothy F (Stanford University) Raff, Daniel M G (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

2.681 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A recent empirical literature has shaken economists' confidence in the value of aggregate (industry-level) data to illuminate production relationships. But the statistical finding 'you can't aggregate,' however well documented, is not an economic explanation. Plant-level relationships do aggregate in Depression-era blast furnace operations despite the presence of very substantial interplant heterogeneity, the most common economic cause of nonaggregability. The economic explanation of this lies in poor short-run substitutability of one plant's output for another's. Substitutability determines the importance of composition effects in understanding aggregate time series, constrains the potential cleansing effects of recessions, and therefore influences industry evolution quite broadly. Copyright 1996 by University of Chicago Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jpolec:v:104:y:1996:i:2:p:241-66
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24