Law and Finance Matter: Lessons from Externally Imposed Courts

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2017
Volume: 30
Issue: 3
Pages: 1019-1051

Authors (3)

James R. Brown (Texas A&M University) J. Anthony Cookson (not in RePEc) Rawley Z. Heimer (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper provides novel evidence on the real and financial market effects of legal institutions. Our analysis exploits persistent and externally imposed differences in court enforcement that arose when the U.S. Congress assigned state courts to adjudicate contracts on a subset of Native American reservations. Using area-specific data on small business lending, we find that reservations assigned to state courts, which enforce contracts more predictably than tribal courts, have stronger credit markets. Moreover, the law-driven component of credit market development is associated with significantly higher per capita income, with stronger effects in sectors that depend more on external financing.Received April 24, 2015; accepted March 7, 2016 by Editor Robin Greenwood.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:30:y:2017:i:3:p:1019-1051.
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24