Does it pay to pay performance fees? Empirical evidence from Dutch pension funds

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of International Money and Finance
Year: 2019
Volume: 93
Issue: C
Pages: 299-312

Authors (3)

Broeders, Dirk W.G.A. (Maastricht University) van Oord, Arco (not in RePEc) Rijsbergen, David R. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We analyze the relation between investment returns and performance fees for 218 Dutch occupational pension funds with an average total of 1090 billion euro in assets under management from 2012 to 2017. Our dataset is free from self-reporting biases and includes total return, excess return and performance fees for six major asset classes. We find no statistical evidence that the returns of pension funds that pay performance fees to asset managers for active investing are significantly higher or lower than the returns of pension funds that do not pay performance fees. This is true for most asset classes and robust if we correct for risk. We also document that large and more specialized pension funds pay less performance fees for a given level of excess return in alternative asset classes such as hedge funds and private equity. This is possibly the result of better negotiation power due to their larger scale or higher level of expertise.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jimfin:v:93:y:2019:i:c:p:299-312
Journal Field
International
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24