Monopsony and competition: The impact of rival leagues on player salaries during the early days of baseball

B-Tier
Journal: Explorations in Economic History
Year: 2017
Volume: 65
Issue: C
Pages: 55-67

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

During the early days of professional baseball, the dominant major leagues imposed a “reserve clause” designed to limit player wages by restricting competition for labor. Entry into the market by rival leagues challenged the incumbent monopsony cartel's ability to restrict compensation. Using a sample of player salaries from the first 40 years of the reserve clause (1880–1919), this study examines the impact of inter-league competition on player wages. This study finds a positive salary effect associated with rival league entry that is consistent with monopsony wage suppression, but the effect is stronger during the 20th century than the 19th century. Changes in levels of market saturation and minor-league competition may explain differences in the effects between the two eras.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:exehis:v:65:y:2017:i:c:p:55-67
Journal Field
Economic History
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25