Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples

A-Tier
Journal: Experimental Economics
Year: 2013
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 170-189

Authors (9)

Jon Anderson (not in RePEc) Stephen Burks (University of Minnesota) Jeffrey Carpenter (not in RePEc) Lorenz Götte (not in RePEc) Karsten Maurer (not in RePEc) Daniele Nosenzo (Aarhus Universitet) Ruth Potter (not in RePEc) Kim Rocha (not in RePEc) Aldo Rustichini (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.447 = (α=2.01 / 9 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We measure the other-regarding behavior in samples from three related populations in the upper Midwest of the United States: college students, non-student adults from the community surrounding the college, and adult trainee truckers in a residential training program. The use of typical experimental economics recruitment procedures made the first two groups substantially self-selected. Because the context reduced the opportunity cost of participating dramatically, 91 % of the adult trainees solicited participated, leaving little scope for self-selection in this sample. We find no differences in the elicited other-regarding preferences between the self-selected adults and the adult trainees, suggesting that selection is unlikely to bias inferences about the prevalence of other-regarding preferences among non-student adult subjects. Our data also reject the more specific hypothesis that approval-seeking subjects are the ones most likely to select into experiments. Finally, we observe a large difference between self-selected college students and self-selected adults: the students appear considerably less pro-social. Copyright Economic Science Association 2013

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:expeco:v:16:y:2013:i:2:p:170-189
Journal Field
Experimental
Author Count
9
Added to Database
2026-01-25