Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models.

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Finance
Year: 1997
Volume: 52
Issue: 5
Pages: 2003-49

Authors (3)

Bakshi, Gurdip (not in RePEc) Cao, Charles (Tsinghua University) Chen, Zhiwu (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in developing more realistic option pricing models. Empirically, however, it is not known whether and by how much each generalization improves option pricing and hedging. The authors fill this gap by first deriving an option model that allows volatility, interest rates, and jumps to be stochastic. Using S&P 500 options, they examine several alternative models from three perspectives: (1) internal consistency of implied parameters/volatility with relevant time-series data, (2) out-of-sample pricing, and (3) hedging. Overall, incorporating stochastic volatility and jumps is important for pricing and internal consistency. But for hedging, modeling stochastic volatility alone yields the best performance. Copyright 1997 by American Finance Association.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jfinan:v:52:y:1997:i:5:p:2003-49
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25