Small Sample Bias and Adjustment Costs.

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 1994
Volume: 76
Issue: 1
Pages: 52-58

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 1 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The response of most stock variables (e.g., capital, housing, consumer durables, and prices) to exogenous impulses involves a dynamic-or 'short-run' - reaction, and a target - or 'long-run' - reaction. The difference between these two is typically attributed to some form of adjustment cost. In this paper I argue that the small sample problems of cointegrating procedures used to estimate the ' long'-run component are particularly severe when adjustment costs are important. More precisely, elasticity estimates will tend to be biased downward. I illustrate the empirical relevance of this by showing that the target elasticity of capital with respect to its cost is - severely downward biased when estimated with conventional OLS cointegration procedures. Once this is corrected, the elasticity of the U.S. capital-output ratio to the cost of capital is found to be large and close to (minus) one. Copyright 1994 by MIT Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:76:y:1994:i:1:p:52-58
Journal Field
General
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25