Spatially coordinated conservation auctions: A framed field experiment focusing on farmland wildlife conservation in China

A-Tier
Journal: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Year: 2024
Volume: 106
Issue: 4
Pages: 1354-1379

Authors (7)

Zhaoyang Liu (University of Cambridge) Simanti Banerjee (not in RePEc) Timothy N. Cason (Purdue University) Nick Hanley (not in RePEc) Qi Liu (not in RePEc) Jintao Xu (not in RePEc) Andreas Kontoleon (University of Cambridge)

Score contribution per author:

0.575 = (α=2.01 / 7 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

How best to incentivize land managers to achieve conservation goals in an economically and ecologically effective manner is a key policy question that has gained increased relevance from the setting of ambitious new global targets for biodiversity conservation. Conservation (reverse) auctions are a policy tool for improving the environmental performance of agriculture, which has become well‐established in the academic literature and in policy making in the US and Australia. However, little is known about the likely response of farmers to incentives within such an auction to (1) increase spatial connectivity and (2) encourage collective participation. This paper presents the first framed field experiment with farmers as participants that examines the effects of two features of conservation policy design: joint (collective) participation by farmers and the incentivization of spatial connectivity. The experiment employs farmers in China, a country making increasing use of payments for ecosystem services to achieve a range of environmental objectives. We investigate whether auction performance—both economic and ecological—can be improved by the introduction of agglomeration bonus and joint bidding bonus mechanisms. Our empirical results suggest that, compared to a baseline spatially coordinated conservation auction, the performance of an auction with an agglomeration bonus, a joint bidding bonus, or both, is inferior on two key metrics—the environmental benefits generated and cost effectiveness realized.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:4:p:1354-1379
Journal Field
Agricultural
Author Count
7
Added to Database
2026-01-25