Why canʼt a woman bid more like a man?

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2013
Volume: 77
Issue: 1
Pages: 181-213

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We investigate gender differences and menstrual cycle effects in first-price and second-price sealed-bid auctions with independent private values in a laboratory setting. We find that women bid significantly higher and earn significantly less than men do in the first-price auction, while we find no evidence of a gender difference in bidding or earnings in the second-price auction. Focusing on the first-price auction, we find that, while the gender gap in bidding and earnings persists over the entire course of the menstrual cycle, bidding of contraceptive pill users follows a sine-like pattern throughout the menstrual cycle, with higher than average bidding in the follicular phase and lower than average bidding in the luteal phase. In comparison, pill non-users have a flat bidding profile throughout the cycle.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:77:y:2013:i:1:p:181-213
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25