Score contribution per author:
α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count
In ordinal (probabilistic) assignment problems, each agent reports his preference rankings over objects and receives a lottery defined over those objects. A common efficiency notion, sd-efficiency, is obtained by extending the preference rankings to preferences over lotteries by means of (first-order) stochastic dominance. Two alternative efficiency notions, which we call dl- and ul-efficiency, are based on downward and upward lexicographic dominance, respectively. We show that sd-, dl-, and ul-efficiency are all equivalent. Noting that the three efficiency notions are a refinement of ex post efficiency—another well-known efficiency notion—we also identify sufficient and necessary conditions on preference profiles under which ex post efficiency is equivalent to the three notions.