Anticipated Discrimination, Choices, and Performance: Experimental Evidence

B-Tier
Journal: European Economic Review
Year: 2020
Volume: 127
Issue: C

Authors (4)

Charness, Gary Cobo-Reyes, Ramón (Georgetown University) Meraglia, Simone (not in RePEc) Sánchez, Ángela (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.505 = (α=2.02 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

This paper studies experimentally whether potential perceived discrimination affects decisions in a labor-market setting with different stereotypes.  Participants are assigned to a seven-person group and randomly allocated a role as a firm or worker. In each group, there are five workers and two firms. The only information firms have about each worker is a self-selected avatar (male, female or neutral) representing a worker's gender. Each firm then decides which worker to hire. Female workers react to potential discrimination when they know the task is math-related, but not otherwise. Men choose similar avatar patterns regardless of the task. Men do perform at much higher levels in the math-related task, but there is no difference in performance in the emotion-recognition task, where there is a strong female stereotype.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:eecrev:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120301057
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25