Dealing with consumer default: Bankruptcy vs garnishment

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Monetary Economics
Year: 2012
Volume: 59
Issue: S
Pages: S1-S16

Authors (2)

Chatterjee, Satyajit (not in RePEc) Gordon, Grey (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmo...)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

What are the positive and normative implications of eliminating bankruptcy protection for indebted individuals? Without bankruptcy protection, creditors can collect on defaulted debt to the extent permitted by wage garnishment laws. The elimination lowers the default premium on unsecured debt and permits low-net-worth individuals suffering bad earnings shocks to smooth consumption by borrowing. There is a large increase in consumer debt financed essentially by super-wealthy individuals, a modest drop in capital per worker, and a higher frequency of consumer default. Average welfare rises by 1% of consumption in perpetuity, with about 90% of households favoring the change.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:moneco:v:59:y:2012:i:s:p:s1-s16
Journal Field
Macro
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25