VOTING, PUNISHMENT, AND PUBLIC GOODS

C-Tier
Journal: Economic Inquiry
Year: 2007
Volume: 45
Issue: 3
Pages: 557-570

Score contribution per author:

0.335 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Researchers have found that voting can help increase voluntary contributions to a public good—provided enforcement through a third party. Not all collective agreements, however, guarantee third‐party enforcement. We design an experiment to explore whether a voting rule with and without endogenous punishment increases contributions to a public good. Our results suggest that voting by itself does not increase cooperation, but if voters can punish violators, contributions increase significantly. While costly punishment increases contributions at the price of lower efficiency, overall efficiency for a voting‐with‐punishment rule still exceeds the level observed for a voting‐without‐punishment rule. (JEL C92, D72, H41)

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:ecinqu:v:45:y:2007:i:3:p:557-570
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25