The impact of trading on the costs and benefits of the Acid Rain Program

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Year: 2018
Volume: 88
Issue: C
Pages: 180-209

Score contribution per author:

1.009 = (α=2.02 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We quantify the cost savings from the Acid Rain Program (ARP) by comparing compliance costs for 761 coal-fired generating units under the ARP with compliance costs under a counterfactual uniform performance standard (UPS) that would have achieved the same aggregate emissions in 2002. In 2002, we find compliance costs to be $200 million (1995$) lower and health damages to be $170 million (1995$) lower under the ARP. We also compare health damages associated with observed SO2 emissions from all ARP units in 2002 with damages from a no-trade counterfactual. Damages under the ARP are $2.1 billion (1995$) higher than under the no-trade scenario, reflecting allowance transfers from units in the western US to units in the eastern US with larger exposed populations.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeeman:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:180-209
Journal Field
Environment
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25