The Walsh contract for central bankers proves optimal after all!

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2007
Volume: 131
Issue: 1
Pages: 243-247

Authors (2)

Georgios Chortareas (not in RePEc) Stephen Miller (University of Nevada-Las Vegas)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A recent paper argues that the Walsh linear inflation contract does not prove optimal when the government concerns itself about the cost of the central bank contract (Candel-Sánchez & Campoy-Miñarro, 2004). This result relies on assuming that the participation constraint does not represent an effective constraint on the central banker’s decision. We show that the Walsh linear inflation contract does produce the optimal outcome, even when the government cares about the cost of the contract, assuming that the participation constraint holds. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:131:y:2007:i:1:p:243-247
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25