Survey Design and the Analysis of Satisfaction

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 2011
Volume: 93
Issue: 3
Pages: 1087-1093

Authors (2)

Gabriella Conti (not in RePEc) Stephen Pudney (University of Essex)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We analyze the effect of survey design on reported job satisfaction by exploiting two quasi-experiments in the British Household Panel Survey: a change in question design and parallel use of different interview modes. We show that apparently minor differences in survey design lead to substantial biases in econometric results, particularly on gender differences. The common empirical finding that women care less about wages and prefer to work fewer hours than men appears largely an artifact of survey design rather than a true behavioral difference. © 2011 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:93:y:2011:i:3:p:1087-1093
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25