Are U.S. CEOs Paid More Than U.K. CEOs? Inferences from Risk-adjusted Pay

A-Tier
Journal: The Review of Financial Studies
Year: 2011
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Pages: 402-438

Authors (3)

Martin J. Conyon (University of Pennsylvania) John E. Core (not in RePEc) Wayne R. Guay (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.345 = (α=2.02 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We compute and compare risk-adjusted CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom, where the risk adjustment is based on estimated risk premiums stemming from the equity incentives borne by CEOs. Controlling for firm and industry characteristics, we find that U.S. CEOs have higher pay, but also bear much higher stock and option incentives than U.K. CEOs. Using reasonable estimates of risk premiums, we find that risk-adjusted U.S. CEO pay does not appear to be large compared to that of U.K. CEOs. We also examine differences in pay and equity incentives between a sample of non-U.K. European CEOs and a matched sample of U.S. CEOs, and find that risk-adjusting pay may explain about half of the apparent higher pay for U.S. CEOs. The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]., Oxford University Press.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:rfinst:v:24:y:2011:i:2:p:402-438
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25