What is the marginal benefit of payment‐induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients

B-Tier
Journal: Health Economics
Year: 2019
Volume: 28
Issue: 5
Pages: 678-692

Authors (4)

Norma B. Coe (not in RePEc) Jing Guo (not in RePEc) R. Tamara Konetzka (not in RePEc) Courtney Harold Van Houtven (Durham VA Medical Center)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Research on home‐based long‐term care has centered almost solely on the costs; there has been very little, if any, attention paid to the relative benefits. This study exploits the randomization built into the Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation program that directly impacted the likelihood of having family involved in home care delivery. Randomization in the trial is used as an instrumental variable for family involvement in care, resulting in a causal estimate of the effect of changing the combination of home health‐care providers on health‐care utilization and health outcomes of the beneficiary. We find that some family involvement in home‐based care significantly decreases health‐care utilization: lower likelihood of emergency room use, Medicaid‐financed inpatient days, any Medicaid hospital expenditures, and fewer months with Medicaid‐paid inpatient use. We find that individuals who have some family involved in home‐based care are less likely to have several adverse health outcomes within the first 9 months of the trial, including lower prevalence of infections, bedsores, or shortness of breath, suggesting that the lower utilization may be due to better health outcomes.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:hlthec:v:28:y:2019:i:5:p:678-692
Journal Field
Health
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25