Why real leisure really matters: incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory

A-Tier
Journal: Experimental Economics
Year: 2015
Volume: 18
Issue: 2
Pages: 284-301

Authors (3)

Brice Corgnet (not in RePEc) Roberto Hernán-González (not in RePEc) Eric Schniter (Chapman University)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

On-the-job leisure is a pervasive feature of the modern workplace. We studied its impact on work performance in a laboratory experiment by either allowing or restricting Internet access. We used a 2 × 2 experimental design in which subjects completing real-effort work tasks could earn cash according to either individual- or team-production incentive schemes. Under team pay, production levels were significantly lower when Internet browsing was available than when it was not. Under individual pay, however, no differences in production levels were observed between the treatment in which Internet was available and the treatment in which it was not. In line with standard incentive theory, individual pay outperformed team pay across all periods of the experiment when Internet browsing was available. This was not the case, however, when Internet browsing was unavailable. These results demonstrate that the integration of on-the-job leisure activities into an experimental labor design is crucial for uncovering incentive effects. Copyright Economic Science Association 2015

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:expeco:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:284-301
Journal Field
Experimental
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25