Auction prices, market share, and a common agent

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2012
Volume: 81
Issue: 1
Pages: 61-73

Authors (3)

Coatney, Kalyn T. (not in RePEc) Shaffer, Sherrill L. (Australian National University) Menkhaus, Dale J. (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The primary pro-competitive justification for multiple principals to hire a common bidding agent is efficiency. The efficiency gained by doing so increases the advantage of the common bidding agent. Almost common value auction theory predicts that an advantaged bidder is able to reduce competition by credibly enhancing the ‘winner's curse’ of disadvantaged rivals. The credible threat results in disadvantaged rivals exiting the bidding process early, leaving the advantaged bidder to purchase most, if not all, units at lower prices than when rivals have common values. The results of our empirical study of a common bidding agent are consistent with this theory.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:81:y:2012:i:1:p:61-73
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25