Capital–Skill Complementarity: Does Capital Composition Matter?

B-Tier
Journal: Scandanavian Journal of Economics
Year: 2019
Volume: 121
Issue: 1
Pages: 89-116

Authors (3)

Juan A. Correa (not in RePEc) Miguel Lorca (not in RePEc) Francisco Parro (Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We estimate the effect of capital composition on the size of capital–skill complementarity and the skill wage premium. Disaggregating the capital stock into different types according to technological content, we find that: capital is more of a q‐complement to skilled labor than to unskilled labor; the higher the technological component of capital, the larger the size of the relative q‐complementarity between capital and skilled labor; and replacing non‐technological with technological capital might increase the skill wage premium by about 9 percent. Our results highlight that changes in capital composition matter for understanding changes in the skill wage premium.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:scandj:v:121:y:2019:i:1:p:89-116
Journal Field
General
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25