Communication in Coordination Games

S-Tier
Journal: Quarterly Journal of Economics
Year: 1992
Volume: 107
Issue: 2
Pages: 739-771

Authors (4)

Russell Cooper (not in RePEc) Douglas V. DeJong (not in RePEc) Robert Forsythe (Wayne State University) Thomas W. Ross (University of British Columbia)

Score contribution per author:

2.011 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We present experimental evidence on nonbinding, preplay communication in bilateral coordination games. To evaluate the effect of "cheap talk," we consider two communication structures (one-way and two-way communication) and two types of coordination games (one with a cooperative strategy and a second in which one strategy is less "risky"). In games with a cooperative strategy, one-way communication increases play of the Pareto-dominant equilibrium relative to the no communication baseline; two-way communication does not always decrease the frequency of coordination failures. In the second type of game, two-way communication always leads to the Pareto-dominant Nash equilibrium, while one-way communication does not.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:qjecon:v:107:y:1992:i:2:p:739-771.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25