Rules versus Discretion: Treatment of Mental Illness in US Adolescents

S-Tier
Journal: Journal of Political Economy
Year: 2026
Volume: 134
Issue: 1
Pages: 478 - 522

Authors (2)

Emily Cuddy (not in RePEc) Janet Currie (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Many mental health disorders start in adolescence, and appropriate initial treatment may improve trajectories. But what is appropriate treatment? We use a large national database of insurance claims to examine the impact of initial mental health treatment on the outcomes of adolescent children over the next 2 years, where treatment is either consistent with US Food and Drug Administration guidelines, consistent with looser guidelines published by professional societies (gray area prescribing), or inconsistent with any guidelines (red-flag prescribing). We find that red-flag prescribing increases self-harm, use of emergency rooms, and health care costs, suggesting that treatment guidelines effectively scale up good treatment in practice.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/738249
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25