Dealing with Time Inconsistency: Inflation Targeting versus Exchange Rate Targeting

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking
Year: 2018
Volume: 50
Issue: 7
Pages: 1369-1399

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Adopting a single instead of multiple targets can be an effective way to overcome the classic time‐inconsistency problem. The choice of a single mandate depends on the trade openness and the credibility. Reduced‐form empirical results show as central banks become less credible, they are more likely to adopt a pegged exchange rate, and the tendency to peg depends on trade openness. In a model with “loose commitment,” as credibility falls, either an inflation target or a pegged exchange rate is more likely to be adopted. A relatively closed (highly open) economy would adopt an inflation target (exchange rate peg).

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:jmoncb:v:50:y:2018:i:7:p:1369-1399
Journal Field
Macro
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25