What Is the Case for Paid Maternity Leave?

A-Tier
Journal: Review of Economics and Statistics
Year: 2016
Volume: 98
Issue: 4
Pages: 655-670

Authors (4)

Gordon B. Dahl (not in RePEc) Katrine V. Løken (Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH)) Magne Mogstad (University of Chicago) Kari Vea Salvanes (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We assess the case for generous government-funded maternity leave, focusing on a series of policy reforms in Norway that expanded paid leave from 18 to 35 weeks. We find the reforms do not crowd out unpaid leave and that mothers spend more time at home without a reduction in family income. The increased maternity leave has little effect on children's schooling, parental earnings and labor force participation, completed fertility, marriage, or divorce. The expansions, whose net costs amounted to 0.25% of GDP, have negative redistribution properties and imply a considerable increases in taxes at a cost to economic efficiency.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:tpr:restat:v:98:y:2016:i:4:p:655-670
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25