Affecting policy by manipulating prediction markets: Experimental evidence

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2013
Volume: 85
Issue: C
Pages: 48-62

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Documented results indicate prediction markets effectively aggregate information and form accurate predictions. This has led to a proliferation of markets predicting everything from the results of elections to a company's sales to movie box office receipts. Recent research suggests prediction markets are robust to manipulation attacks and resulting market outcomes improve forecast accuracy. However, we present evidence from the lab indicating that single-minded, well-funded manipulators can in fact destroy a prediction market's ability to aggregate informative prices and mislead those who are making forecasts based upon market predictions. However, we find that manipulators primarily influence market trades meaning outstanding bids and asks remain informative.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:85:y:2013:i:c:p:48-62
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25