Supervisory enforcement actions and bank deposits

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2019
Volume: 106
Issue: C
Pages: 110-123

Authors (3)

Delis, Manthos D. (not in RePEc) Staikouras, Panagiotis K. (not in RePEc) Tsoumas, Chris

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We assess the effect of formal enforcement actions against banks for safety and soundness reasons on punished banks’ deposits, and then examine whether this effect is caused by demand-side or supply-side forces. To this end, we use hand-collected data on enforcement actions, and bank-quarter data on deposits and other bank characteristics from 2000 through 2014. Our results show that total deposits at punished banks decrease by 8.5% in the post-enforcement year, with uninsured deposits declining by 14.5% and insured deposits falling by 7.4%. We also find that the deposit decline is predominantly caused by demand-side forces, that is, by punished banks’ decision to curtail the asset side of their balance sheet.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:106:y:2019:i:c:p:110-123
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25