Reevaluating the prudence of economic forecasts in the EU: The role of instrument persistence

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Applied Econometrics
Year: 2021
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 151-161

Authors (3)

Matei Demetrescu (TU Dortmund, Fakultät Statisti...) Christoph Roling (not in RePEc) Anna Titova (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.673 = (α=2.02 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Christodoulakis and Mamatzakis (2009, Journal of Applied Econometrics 24, pp. 583–606) estimate the EU Commission loss preferences for selected economic forecasts of 12 EU Member States. They employ the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation procedure proposed by Elliott et al. (2005, Review of Economic Studies 72, pp. 1107–1125) and find the forecasts to be somewhat optimistic on average. However, this note shows the GMM estimator to possess nonstandard limiting distributions when some of the instruments are highly persistent, which is the case with one of the instruments employed by Christodoulakis and Mamatzakis. Standard distributions are recovered in some interesting particular cases which are relevant in practice. A reexamination of the EU Commission loss preferences using methods robust to persistence and a dataset extended to 2017 reveals that, while the conclusions of the original study are, by and large, still justified, the EU Commission loss preferences have become more symmetric over the whole studied period.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:wly:japmet:v:36:y:2021:i:1:p:151-161
Journal Field
Econometrics
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25