Spectrum value for coalitional games

B-Tier
Journal: Games and Economic Behavior
Year: 2013
Volume: 82
Issue: C
Pages: 132-142

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Assuming a ‘spectrum’ or ordering of the players of a coalitional game, as in a political spectrum in a parliamentary situation, we consider a variation of the Shapley value in which coalitions may only be formed if they are connected with respect to the spectrum. This results in a naturally asymmetric power index in which positioning along the spectrum is critical. We present both a characterization of this value by means of properties and combinatoric formulae for calculating it. In simple majority games, the greatest power accrues to ‘moderate’ players who are located neither at the extremes of the spectrum nor in its center. In supermajority games, power increasingly accrues towards the extremes, and in unanimity games all power is held by the players at the extreme of the spectrum.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:gamebe:v:82:y:2013:i:c:p:132-142
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24