What determines the return to education: An extra year or a hurdle cleared?

B-Tier
Journal: Economics of Education Review
Year: 2011
Volume: 30
Issue: 6
Pages: 1167-1176

Authors (2)

Dickson, Matt (not in RePEc) Smith, Sarah (University of Bristol)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The 1973 Raising of the School Leaving Age from 15 to 16 has been used to identify returns to years’ schooling. However, because the first set of “high stakes” exams are taken in the UK at age 16, the reform affected the proportion with qualifications, as well as schooling length. In order to shed light on whether the returns reflect the extra length of schooling or the increase in qualifications, we exploit another institutional rule – the Easter Leaving Rule – which we argue only affected the probability of obtaining qualifications (and not the length of schooling). We find sizeable returns to academic qualifications – increasing the probability of employment by 40% points – and our results suggest that qualifications drive most of the returns to education.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:ecoedu:v:30:y:2011:i:6:p:1167-1176
Journal Field
Education
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25