Gender Differences in Medical Evaluations: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Doctors

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2024
Volume: 114
Issue: 2
Pages: 462-99

Authors (2)

Marika Cabral (not in RePEc) Marcus Dillender (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

4.022 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Little is known about what drives gender disparities in health care and related social insurance benefits. Using data and variation from the Texas workers' compensation program, we study the impact of gender match between doctors and patients on medical evaluations and associated disability benefits. Compared to differences among their male patient counterparts, female patients randomly assigned a female doctor rather than a male doctor are 5.2 percent more likely to be evaluated as disabled and receive 8.6 percent more subsequent cash benefits on average. There is no analogous gender-match effect for male patients. Our estimates indicate that increasing the share of female patients evaluated by female doctors may substantially shrink gender gaps in medical evaluations and associated outcomes.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:114:y:2024:i:2:p:462-99
Journal Field
General
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25