‘Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment’

A-Tier
Journal: Economic Journal
Year: 2021
Volume: 131
Issue: 640
Pages: 3145-3181

Authors (4)

L I Dobrescu (not in RePEc) M Faravelli (not in RePEc) R Megalokonomou (University of Queensland) A Motta (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

In a one-year randomised controlled trial involving thousands of university students, we provide real-time private feedback on relative performance in a semester-long online assignment. Within this set-up, our experimental design cleanly identifies the behavioural response to rank incentives (i.e., incentives stemming from an inherent preference for high rank). We find that rank incentives boost performance in the related course assignment, but also the average course exams grade by 0.21 SDs. These beneficial effects remain sizeable across all quantiles and extend beyond the intervention period. Furthermore, rank feedback stimulates social learning, i.e., rank incentives make students engage more in peer interactions.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:640:p:3145-3181.
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25