Socially optimal mistakes? debiasing COVID-19 mortality risk perceptions and prosocial behavior

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2021
Volume: 183
Issue: C
Pages: 456-480

Authors (3)

Abel, Martin (Bowdoin College) Byker, Tanya (not in RePEc) Carpenter, Jeffrey (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The perception of risk affects how people behave during crises. We conduct a series of experiments to explore how people form COVID-19 mortality risk beliefs and the implications for prosocial behavior. We first document that people overestimate their own risk and that of young people, while underestimating the risk old people face. We show that the availability heuristic contributes to these biased beliefs. Using information about the actual risk to debias people’s own risk perception does not affect donations to the Centers for Disease Control but does decrease the amount of time invested in learning how to protect older people. This constitutes a debiasing social dilemma. Additionally providing information on the risk for the elderly, however, counteracts these negative effects. Importantly, debiasing seems to operate through the subjective categorization of and emotional response to new information.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jeborg:v:183:y:2021:i:c:p:456-480
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-24