In Defense of Boards

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Year: 2008
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Pages: 667-682

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

It is often assumed that bad corporate performance means a bad CEO. The task of a board of directors is then simple: dismiss the executive. If it fails to do so, the board is said to be indolent. We take a kinder approach to observed board behavior and point to the problems even well‐intended boards would encounter. They face the twin task of disciplining and screening executives. We analyze the nature of the retention contract a board uses to discipline and screen executives. Consistent with empirical observation, we find that executives may become overly active to show their credentials, and that the link between bad performance and dismissal is weak.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jemstr:v:17:y:2008:i:3:p:667-682
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25