Feasible sets, comparative risk aversion, and comparative uncertainty aversion in bargaining

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Mathematical Economics
Year: 2016
Volume: 67
Issue: C
Pages: 162-170

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We study feasible sets of the bargaining problem under two different assumptions: the players are subjective expected utility maximizers or the players are Choquet expected utility maximizers. For the latter case, we consider the effects on bargaining solutions when players become more risk averse and when they become more uncertainty averse.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:mateco:v:67:y:2016:i:c:p:162-170
Journal Field
Theory
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25