Getting what we vote for: A regression discontinuity test of ballot initiative outcomes

B-Tier
Journal: Regional Science and Urban Economics
Year: 2017
Volume: 64
Issue: C
Pages: 46-56

Score contribution per author:

2.018 = (α=2.02 / 1 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

What do voters really receive when they vote? This paper exploits 25 years of municipal level voting data in Massachusetts to identify the specific effects of voter approved ballots. In particular, this analysis attempts to determine the degree to which the median voter preferences are reflected in public expenditures. The findings suggest that voters see little change in expenditures, regardless of voting outcomes. To my knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind to directly link voting outcomes with non capital expenditure outcomes. This has important implications for discussing frictions that arise between voter preferences and local public expenditures.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:regeco:v:64:y:2017:i:c:p:46-56
Journal Field
Urban/Geographic
Author Count
1
Added to Database
2026-01-25