District magnitude and representation of the majority’s preferences—a reply and new perspectives

B-Tier
Journal: Public Choice
Year: 2013
Volume: 154
Issue: 1
Pages: 149-151

Score contribution per author:

0.670 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

We reply to the comment of John Carey and Simon Hix on our original contribution entitled “District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority’s Preferences: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Popular and Parliamentary Votes” in Public Choice 151:585–610 ( 2012 ). District magnitude does not necessarily affect deviations between political representatives and their district voters in a strictly monotonic way but monotonicity is upheld for deviations between representatives and the national majority. We provide new perspectives and caution against evaluating electoral systems by focusing on individual politicians’ behavior but neglecting aggregation effects. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:kap:pubcho:v:154:y:2013:i:1:p:149-151
Journal Field
Public
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25