Are auction revenues affected by rising art buyers' premia? The case of early American art

C-Tier
Journal: Applied Economics
Year: 2015
Volume: 47
Issue: 14
Pages: 1389-1400

Authors (4)

Seth C. Anderson (not in RePEc) Robert B. Jr Ekelund John D. Jackson (not in RePEc) Robert D. Tollison

Score contribution per author:

0.251 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 0.5x C-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

The steady rise in the premiums charged to art buyers at auction (above hammer price) has been underway since 1992. This article, using a stable and bounded sample of repeat purchase of American works created before 1950, reveals that this tact has reduced hammer prices for that art. However, renewed and hyper-competitive efforts to bring more and higher quality art to market by the two main houses, Sotheby's and Christie's, have resulted in general profitability. Nevertheless, we calculate that a rise in buyers' premia at Sotheby's, a publically traded company, has reduced revenues and profits below their potential in the absence of such increases.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:taf:applec:v:47:y:2015:i:14:p:1389-1400
Journal Field
General
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25