Who wins and who loses from bank geographic deregulation? Analysis of financially constrained and unconstrained firms

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Corporate Finance
Year: 2020
Volume: 65
Issue: C

Authors (4)

Berger, Allen N. (not in RePEc) Chen, Ruiyuan (Ryan) (not in RePEc) El Ghoul, Sadok (University of Alberta, Campus ...) Guedhami, Omrane (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

0.503 = (α=2.01 / 4 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

A key issue in the finance-growth nexus literature is endogeneity – economic growth may drive finance as well as finance driving growth. Some research addresses endogeneity using relatively exogenous shocks from U.S. bank geographic deregulation, often documenting favorable economic effects. We connect deregulation shocks for the first time to individual firm growth in a model that differentiates sources of external financing – short-term debt, long-term debt, and equity. Our results suggest that deregulation increases firm growth overall and this growth is fueled by all three external funding sources. However, benefits accrue only to relatively financially unconstrained firms, while relatively constrained firms lose.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:corfin:v:65:y:2020:i:c:s0929119920302194
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
4
Added to Database
2026-01-25