Non-comparative versus comparative advertising of quality

B-Tier
Journal: International Journal of Industrial Organization
Year: 2012
Volume: 30
Issue: 4
Pages: 352-360

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Two firms produce a good with a horizontal and a vertical characteristic called quality. The difference in the unobservable quality levels determines how the firms share the market. We consider two scenarios: In the first one, firms disclose quality; in the second one, they send costly signals thereof. Under non-comparative advertising a firm advertises its own quality, under comparative advertising a firm advertises the quality differential. In either scenario, under comparative advertising the firms never advertise together which they may do under non-comparative advertising. Moreover, under comparative advertising firms do not advertise when the informational value to consumers is small.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:indorg:v:30:y:2012:i:4:p:352-360
Journal Field
Industrial Organization
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25