Anomalies and News

A-Tier
Journal: Journal of Finance
Year: 2018
Volume: 73
Issue: 5
Pages: 1971-2001

Authors (3)

JOSEPH ENGELBERG (University of California-San D...) R. DAVID MCLEAN (not in RePEc) JEFFREY PONTIFF (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.341 = (α=2.01 / 3 authors) × 2.0x A-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Using a sample of 97 stock return anomalies, we find that anomaly returns are 50% higher on corporate news days and six times higher on earnings announcement days. These results could be explained by dynamic risk, mispricing due to biased expectations, or data mining. We develop and conduct several unique tests to differentiate between these three explanations. Our results are most consistent with the idea that anomaly returns are driven by biased expectations, which are at least partly corrected upon news arrival.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:bla:jfinan:v:73:y:2018:i:5:p:1971-2001
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
3
Added to Database
2026-01-25