Anticipatory Anxiety and Wishful Thinking

S-Tier
Journal: American Economic Review
Year: 2024
Volume: 114
Issue: 4
Pages: 926-60

Authors (5)

Jan B. Engelmann (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Maël Lebreton (Paris School of Economics) Nahuel A. Salem-Garcia (not in RePEc) Peter Schwardmann (not in RePEc) Joël J. van der Weele (not in RePEc)

Score contribution per author:

1.609 = (α=2.01 / 5 authors) × 4.0x S-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Across five experiments (N = 1,714), we test whether people engage in wishful thinking to alleviate anxiety about adverse future outcomes. Participants perform pattern recognition tasks in which some patterns may result in an electric shock or a monetary loss. Diagnostic of wishful thinking, participants are less likely to correctly identify patterns that are associated with a shock or loss. Wishful thinking is more pronounced under more ambiguous signals and only reduced by higher accuracy incentives when participants' cognitive effort reduces ambiguity. Wishful thinking disappears in the domain of monetary gains, indicating that negative emotions are important drivers of the phenomenon.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:aea:aecrev:v:114:y:2024:i:4:p:926-60
Journal Field
General
Author Count
5
Added to Database
2026-01-25