Does the uncertainty of firm-level fundamentals help explain cross-sectional differences in liquidity commonality?

B-Tier
Journal: Journal of Banking & Finance
Year: 2016
Volume: 68
Issue: C
Pages: 153-161

Authors (2)

Isshaq, Zangina (not in RePEc) Faff, Robert (University of Queensland)

Score contribution per author:

1.005 = (α=2.01 / 2 authors) × 1.0x B-tier

α: calibrated so average coauthorship-adjusted count equals average raw count

Abstract

Our goal is to better understand the economic sources of commonality in liquidity. To this end, we argue that a firm with low (high) volatility in its “fundamental” profitability will have a higher (lower) liquidity commonality because it is more (less) likely to serve as reference stock in the setting of cross-asset learning about fundamentals. As predicted, we find that commonality in liquidity is negatively related to profitability volatility. This negative relation holds after controlling for correlated trading, size, book-to-market effects, idiosyncratic volatility, stock returns, and managerial income smoothing.

Technical Details

RePEc Handle
repec:eee:jbfina:v:68:y:2016:i:c:p:153-161
Journal Field
Finance
Author Count
2
Added to Database
2026-01-25